EMDR avis negatif

EMDR method : negative reviews or effective therapy?

EMDR therapy (Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing) represents a revolutionary approach in the field of psychology, offering a beacon of hope for millions of people suffering from trauma and emotional disorders. Developed in the late 1980s by American psychologist Francine Shapiro, EMDR quickly gained popularity, becoming one of the most discussed and studied methods in the treatment of psychological trauma.

The primary goal of EMDR is to help patients process and overcome traumatic experiences that disrupt their daily lives. Using a specific technique of bilateral stimulation, often through guided eye movements, EMDR aims to access disturbing memories and facilitate their processing by the brain, thereby enabling emotional healing. Proponents of EMDR argue that this method can reduce the intensity of painful memories and promote better integration of past experiences, leading to significant symptom relief for disorders such as PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder), anxiety, depression, and more.

The popularity of EMDR can be attributed to its promise of rapid effectiveness, with many patients reporting noticeable improvement after just a few sessions. Unlike other forms of therapy that may take months or years to show results, EMDR directly targets the source of distress, offering a more direct path to recovery. This apparent efficiency has led to widespread adoption by therapists around the world, with thousands of practitioners trained in EMDR and a growing number of success stories reported in the scientific literature.

However, despite its growing adoption and positive testimonials, EMDR is not without controversy. Vigorous debates have emerged within the scientific and medical communities regarding the validity and effectiveness of EMDR. Some critics question the scientific basis of the therapy, arguing that studies supporting EMDR sometimes lack methodological rigor or that the effects may be attributable to non-specific elements of the therapy, such as the placebo effect or the empathic support of the therapist. Additionally, although much research supports EMDR, the exact understanding of how and why it works remains partly mysterious, further fueling skepticism and the demand for more in-depth research.

Despite these debates, EMDR continues to grow as a popular therapeutic method, with many professionals and patients extolling its benefits. This popularity is supported not only by anecdotal healing stories but also by a growing body of empirical research. While science continues to debate and examine EMDR, for many, it offers a glimmer of hope and a potential path to healing and a better quality of life.

EMDR sits at the intersection of science, controversy, and hope. This article aims to explore this complex and fascinating therapeutic method in depth, examining both the evidence of its effectiveness and the criticisms it faces, in order to provide a balanced perspective on this intriguing treatment.


Definition and concept of EMDR

Origins and development

EMDR, or Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing, is a form of psychological therapy developed by psychologist Francine Shapiro in 1987. The history of EMDR begins with a chance discovery while Shapiro was walking in a park. She noticed that the eye movements she made while observing the trees seemed to reduce the intensity of the disturbing thoughts she was experiencing at that moment. Intrigued by this observation, Shapiro began to hypothesize that eye movements might be linked to the reduction of emotional stress.

Following this discovery, Shapiro conducted research to explore this relationship, leading to the development of EMDR. Her first study, published in 1989, showed that eye movements could indeed reduce the intensity of disturbing thoughts in individuals suffering from trauma. Since then, EMDR has been developed and refined into a structured therapeutic method. The approach gained recognition and popularity, particularly after being used to treat victims of war and natural disasters, and is now recognized as an effective treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In 2007, the Haute Autorité de Santé published a guide on long-term psychiatric conditions and severe anxiety disorders, highlighting EMDR.

The development of EMDR has been marked by collaboration and contributions from numerous other researchers and practitioners, who have helped expand its theoretical base and extend its application to a variety of psychological disorders. The history of EMDR is thus one of an accidental discovery transformed into a therapeutic method that has helped millions of people worldwide.

Lire également notre article sur les avis sur l’aide à domicile 

basic principles

EMDR is based on a series of specific principles and protocols that distinguish it from other forms of therapy. At the heart of EMDR is the idea that traumatic or disturbing experiences can cause disruptions in the brain’s information processing, leading to persistent symptoms. Therefore, EMDR aims to help the brain reprocess these memories in order to reduce their disruptive impact.

Therapy typically proceeds through eight distinct phases, beginning with patient history and preparation, and concluding with closure and reevaluation. The most distinctive aspect of EMDR involves what is known as « bilateral stimulation, » often in the form of guided eye movements. The therapist instructs the patient to move their eyes from left to right while recalling the disturbing memory. This stimulation is believed to facilitate the brain’s information processing.

Other forms of bilateral stimulation, such as alternating sounds or tapping, may also be used. The hypothesis is that these movements stimulate an inherent brain healing process, allowing the patient to process and integrate traumatic memories in a more adaptive manner. EMDR aims to transform how traumatic memories are stored in the brain, thereby reducing their disruptive power and enabling the patient to develop healthier coping strategies for the future.

Fields of application

EMDR was initially developed to treat post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but over the years its application has expanded to a wide range of psychological disorders. Studies have shown it can be effective not only for PTSD, but also for other forms of trauma and stress, including childhood trauma, accidents, assaults, natural disasters, and combat experiences.

Additionally, EMDR is used to treat conditions such as anxiety, depression, dissociative disorders, phobias, chronic pain, and even some addictions. It is particularly relevant for patients who struggle to talk about their traumatic experiences or who have found little relief with other forms of therapy.

Practitioners of EMDR argue that by allowing the brain to reprocess traumatic memories, the therapy can help individuals achieve a more stable emotional well-being, improve their ability to manage stress, and enhance their performance in various areas of life. While EMDR is not a universal solution for all psychological disorders, it provides a valuable option for many individuals seeking to overcome trauma and improve their mental health.

avis EMDR
EMDR (Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing) therapy represents a unique approach in the field of psychology...
Revue de la thérapie EMDR

Effectiveness of EMDR: opinions and scientific studies

Research supporting EMDR (positive opinions)

The effectiveness of EMDR has been the subject of numerous studies and research since its introduction in the 1980s. Research supporting EMDR primarily focuses on its efficacy in treating post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other trauma-related disorders. Multiple studies have demonstrated that EMDR can significantly reduce PTSD symptoms, often more rapidly than other established therapies such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT).

A meta-analysis published in the « Journal of Clinical Psychology » examined the findings of various comparative studies and found that EMDR was as effective, if not more effective, than CBT for treating PTSD. Other research has highlighted the rapid reduction of stress and anxiety symptoms among patients following EMDR, with lasting effects observed in long-term follow-ups.

Studies also indicate that EMDR may be beneficial for other conditions including anxiety, depression, and phobias. Ongoing research aims to further explore its effectiveness across different clinical and demographic contexts. Despite initial skepticism from some sectors of the psychiatric community, the accumulation of empirical evidence has established EMDR as a legitimate and effective therapeutic method.

It’s important to note that the quality and methodologies of studies vary, and while many studies support EMDR, others emphasize the need for additional research to fully understand its mechanism of action and delineate the conditions under which it is most effective. Nevertheless, EMDR continues to gain recognition and is now considered a valid approach in the treatment of various psychological disorders.

Patient testimonials

Patient testimonials constitute an important aspect of assessing the effectiveness of EMDR. Many individuals who have undergone this therapy report significant positive changes in their lives. These individual accounts offer unique perspectives on the impact of EMDR and complement data from clinical research.

Patients often report a noticeable reduction in the intensity of traumatic memories after undergoing EMDR. Many describe emotional relief, decreased anxiety, and overall improvement in their quality of life. Some testimonials mention nearly immediate changes, with patients feeling symptom relief from the early sessions, while others describe a more gradual process of healing and reconciliation with their past.

Additionally, testimonials frequently highlight EMDR’s ability to help patients overcome emotional blocks and progress in other forms of therapy or personal development. For many, EMDR has been a turning point, enabling them to more fully engage in their lives and relationships.

While patient testimonials are subjective and vary from person to person, they provide valuable insights into the real-life impact of EMDR. These personal accounts reinforce clinical study data and offer a complementary perspective on the therapy’s effectiveness. The accumulation of these testimonials continues to support EMDR as a valuable and transformative therapeutic method for many individuals facing psychological distress.

Critiques and limitations of EMDR (negative opinions)

Negative views on EMDR

While EMDR has been recognized as an effective therapy for many individuals, it has also faced criticisms and concerns within the scientific community and among some patients. Critiques of EMDR often focus on several key points, including understanding its mechanism of action, attributing its effectiveness, and claims of miraculous outcomes.

A common point of criticism is the lack of clarity regarding the precise mechanism by which EMDR works. Some mental health professionals argue that eye movements are not essential to the healing process and that the effects of EMDR could largely be attributed to more traditional therapeutic elements such as exposure to traumatic memories and empathic therapist support. This perspective suggests that EMDR may not be fundamentally different or more effective than other established approaches.

Furthermore, some critics express concerns about the rapid and sometimes uncritical adoption of EMDR, suggesting that part of its success may be attributed to trends or placebo effects. There are also concerns about practitioners presenting EMDR as a quick fix or miracle cure, which can be misleading to patients and may lead to unrealistic expectations.

Finally, some patients who have undergone EMDR therapy report not experiencing the expected benefits or having negative experiences, such as intense emotional reactions during sessions. These testimonials highlight the importance of considering individual preferences and reactions to treatment and underscore that EMDR, like any therapy, may not be suitable or effective for everyone.

It’s important to note that while EMDR has empirical support and positive outcomes for many, ongoing critical evaluation and research are essential to better understand its mechanisms and effectiveness across different populations and conditions.

Research limitations

While many studies have supported the effectiveness of EMDR, there are research limitations that need to be addressed for a more comprehensive and precise understanding of the therapy. A common critique concerns the methodology of some EMDR studies. Some research has been criticized for small sample sizes, lack of appropriate control groups, or insufficient randomization. These methodological shortcomings can bias results and make it challenging to determine the true effectiveness of EMDR compared to other treatments.

Additionally, there is a need for long-term research to assess the durability of EMDR effects. While some short-term studies show significant symptom improvements, less is known about how these changes persist over extended periods. Understanding the persistence of EMDR benefits is crucial for evaluating its long-term effectiveness and planning appropriate follow-up strategies.

There is also a call for more diversified research that examines the effectiveness of EMDR in different populations and contexts. Most studies have focused on PTSD resulting from specific types of trauma, leaving questions about how EMDR works for diverse experiences and complex psychological disorders. Furthermore, understanding how cultural, social, and individual factors influence EMDR outcomes can help personalize and improve treatment.

In summary, while EMDR is supported by a significant body of research, it’s essential to acknowledge its critiques and limitations to advance toward a more comprehensive understanding and effective application of the therapy. Addressing these concerns through rigorous and ongoing research is crucial to fully validate EMDR and optimize its use in the field of mental health.

Opinions des thérapeutes

La thérapie EMDR suscite un large éventail d’opinions parmi les thérapeutes, reflétant la diversité de leurs expériences et de leurs perspectives cliniques. Ces opinions variées offrent un aperçu précieux des potentiels et des défis de l’EMDR en tant qu’outil thérapeutique.

Positive opinions from therapists

Many therapists express enthusiastic support for EMDR, highlighting its effectiveness and utility in treating trauma-related disorders. They report remarkable success in helping their patients overcome post-traumatic stress, anxiety, and depression. These practitioners often emphasize the speed at which EMDR can yield results, noting that some patients experience significant relief after just a few sessions. They appreciate EMDR for its ability to access painful memories and emotions in a way that appears less threatening and more manageable for the patient.

Advocates of EMDR within the therapeutic community also emphasize its adaptability and applicability to a variety of psychological disorders. They note that EMDR can be integrated into a broader treatment plan and used in conjunction with other forms of therapy. Additionally, some therapists report that EMDR has been particularly helpful for treating patients who have had limited success with other methods or who struggle to openly discuss their traumatic experiences.

Negative opinions from therapists about EMDR

However, not all therapists share a positive opinion of EMDR. Some express reservations or criticisms, often centered around the lack of a clear understanding of EMDR’s mechanism of action and concerns about the lack of rigor in some studies supporting its effectiveness. These skeptics question the extent to which observed results are due to EMDR’s specific eye movements or rather to common factors in many therapies, such as placebo effects, empathic therapist attention, or simply the passage of time.

Other criticisms come from therapists who have observed mixed or disappointing results with EMDR in their practice. They report that while some patients may benefit from EMDR, others show no significant improvement or find the process uncomfortable or unsettling. These therapists emphasize the importance of not presenting EMDR as a cure-all and recognizing that it may not be suitable for all patients or all types of psychological issues.

Finally, some therapists express concerns about the training and accreditation required to practice EMDR. They highlight that the quality of training can vary significantly and that some practitioners may not be adequately prepared to handle intense emotional responses or complications that may arise during treatment.

In summary, therapists’ opinions on EMDR vary widely, with reports of significant success as well as critiques and reservations. This diversity of opinions underscores the complexity of EMDR as a therapeutic method and the need for ongoing evaluation and rigorous training for practitioners. Understanding this range of experiences and perspectives can help inform best practices and guide future developments in the use of EMDR.


If you want to read the post in french : la méthode EMDR – Avis négatif, ou thérapie efficace ?